phrased my comments directed at the Irish as it seems whenever there is something half decent out of England it is ridiculed and deemed not good enough
those 4 year olds that are forward enough run in the Triumph etc..like Katchit...but they have little scope for further improvement
those 4 year olds that are forward enough run in the Triumph etc..like Katchit...but they have little scope for further improvement
Third in the CH (by not much) and running HE to a head is decent enough form for me.
If you mean the following season, you could make a case that it's Strangely Brown who won in France in the June following his run behind Penzance. Al Eile is the correct answer for the next calendar year.Originally posted by Gareth Flynn@Dec 4 2007, 10:14 AM
Who was the last Triumph runner to win a Grade 1 of any description the following year? Al Eile?
A trainer friend with years of experience in NH was talking to me about this a couple of months back. He is adamant that horses can come back at 6 or 7 and be top class again if they are given an easy campaign at 5 after being put to the sword at 4 to win and place in the top novice events like the Triumph. But they need at least a year and often two, to get over it.Originally posted by Garney@Dec 4 2007, 10:06 AM
Horses that run as Juveniles do progress. But its rarely as a 5yo. ........
It could be argued that highly tried 4yo's in their second season dont progress. Those too weak to do themselves justice at 4, maybe strengthen more and have more scope to progress.
I will answer in order.Originally posted by Gareth Flynn@Dec 3 2007, 09:13 PM
Yes. I thought the longevity of horse's careers was what the gloriously romantic National Hunt game was all about?
He's great. I love him. He'll win more than 10 if he stays fit, no problem. You'd be amazed what some people were saying about him before Haydock though.
I'm sure they'll have many Grade 1s between them in the future, if they stay fit and healthy.
What's your preoccupation with the Irish, Chris? It's puzzling. I'm Irish, and I was arguing with you the other week about how your crabbing of Kauto and Exotic Dancer was completely unfair. A couple of others were too, and at least one of them was also Irish. Doesn't exactly fit your theory, does it?
Like you did Kauto at Haydock?
lowly contested Grade 1's
Please find any post where I said I hope Kauto falls
I don't think Katchit is overrated, far from it. I personally feel he is underrated.Originally posted by Garney@Dec 3 2007, 09:09 PM
I would also say that given Katchit and Harchibald are roughly the same odds to win the champion hurdle at the moment. Both are available at between 6/1 and 8/1. Al Eile isnt mentioned on the oddschecker page, but 25s would sound about right. I would suggest that 2/1 would be good value. Unless of course, Katchit is overrated by the bookies.
I feel he beat Kicking King in races that Suited him more. War Of Attrition in my opinion wasn't at his best and as for Best Mate, the later named had a better ratio over the years.Originally posted by Gareth Flynn@Dec 4 2007, 04:50 PM
lowly contested Grade 1's
Best Mate, War Of Attrition, Kicking King.... "but what did he beat".
Please find any post where I said I hope Kauto falls
Fails, not falls! Certainly not accusing you of that.
I feel he beat Kicking King in races that Suited him more. War Of Attrition in my opinion wasn't at his best and as for Best Mate, the later named had a better ratio over the years.
1990 - 1st Norton's Coin 2nd Toby Tobias 3rd Desert OrchidOriginally posted by chrisbeekracing@Dec 4 2007, 04:46 PM
I still keep my stance on Exotic and Kauto and I don't think they would have figured in the 1st three in the Gold Cups in the early to mid nineties.
Has nobody ever heard of Monksfield (that comment is also valid regarding the size question)?Originally posted by Galileo@Dec 4 2007, 10:52 AM
As for Katchit it….I again ask everyone…do you really think there is much progress likely in a horse that has raced 26 times and he is only 5?