Well realised, Bar! Of course - an average of three runs per horse, not per season, would be tragic. That's everything, too, from 2 y.o.'s to 13 y.o. grizzled chasers who've probably got a decade's worth of slog behind them.
I got mine from the RP database too, Grey!
Hmmm... doesn't sound too good, does it - HARBINGER races 9 times and retires injured. RAIL LINK raced seven times, ditto...
DANSILI obviously does get some sound and durable runners but a quick glance down his progeny list shows a fair few who only race a very few times. Sure it's probably the same for a number of other top class stallions as well and it's not going to make a jot of difference to his book but you'd probably not want to send him or his sons a fragile mare ?
How much would the handicappers have preferred Cape Blanco to be tailed off today or well beaten at least?!
I don't do ratings and I don't memorise them. A general observation is that they have been rating horses too highly and now they have to work out a rating for CB that fits into that pattern.
what do you mean pattern?..he isn't that hard to rate..he bombed out at Ascot and ran to his best in Ireland..seems straight forward to me
How exactly did he bomb out?
That's a valid opinion but not one I share. Now they have to rate his Champion stakes run in the context of the distorted frame they have already created (does that make sense :blink
Horses coming second in King George's don't bomb out.
He may well be better over 10 furlongs, judged on his Champion Stakes performance. This, however, does not mean he doesn't stay a mile and a half - these 2 things are not mutually exclusive.