Ipswich Murders?

LOL

Maybe i should have gone running to the moderators about the comments which have come my way (usually from those that couldnt keep up with the arguments)

Not my style cant be bothered to go over old ground
 
The forum seems to be becoming more and more regulated
Click to expand...

Personally I don't think the regulation is the problem, moreso the need (or perceived need) for it. If you put up a ridiculous viewpoint, prepare to be ridiculed. If you want to slag off a viewpoint, do so with humour. Mr Bull's point somewhere not so long ago is the key to the whole thing, the levels of humour and good grace are plummeting.

People who are constantly whinging or stirring or just generally annoying the shite out of people, with no reciprocal worthwhile contribution should just be told to sod off. No warning. No appeal. Just sod off. It is not a public forum, it is a private one with a generous admission policy.
 
seconded

I have been ridiculed for viewpoints on here before but I have also had my mind changed with well reasoned arguments. If I am wrong i have no problem admitting it and accepting information from those better informed than me
 
I have yet to hear a well reasoned argument about her that isn't based on supposition and innuendo.

I have an idea, why not use the laws of the country and say she is innocent until proven guilty.

If Paula ever tests positive I will be the first on these pages to acknowledge that i made a mistake but I think the snide comments should stop and people should either accept her performances or shut up and talk about something where evidence exists
 
Your post makes sense, Melendez. However, I would pick you up on this point...

"It is not a public forum, it is a private one with a generous admission policy"

Isn't it public? It can be viewed by members of the public with an internet connection. I thought some of the moderation tactics came about because of legal implications for public internet forums?
 
In the sense that you have to be registered to view the forum and registrations have to be ratified and are capable of not being accepted, and that the facility exists to exclude people, I would consider it to be somewhat private.

I wouldn't dispute that it is probably more correctly catagorized as a public forum, in internet speak.
 
Agree entirely, Melendez.

The only ratifications tht get turned down, I beleive, are those Col thinks are spammers - as far as I'm aware, everyone else gets through!
 
Originally posted by Melendez@Dec 15 2006, 10:59 AM

People who are constantly whinging or stirring or just generally annoying the shite out of people, with no reciprocal worthwhile contribution should just be told to sod off.
Click to expand...
:blink:


OK, who am I to argue....

"Sod Off, Ardross" h:)











B)
 
A sixth woman is missing now

My company are providing free taxis to all female staff in Ipswich who finish after 8pm, they are following the example of debenhams who are doing the same
 
Originally posted by ovverbruv@Dec 15 2006, 07:18 PM
A sixth woman is missing now

My company are providing free taxis to all female staff in Ipswich who finish after 8pm, they are following the example of debenhams who are doing the same
Click to expand...
Are you sure ? The BBC says that a woman who was reported as missing earlier has been found safe and well
 
Back
Top