Quite.
It's always the same when the "wrong" horse, with the wrong pedigree, bred by the wrong people, sold for the wrong price, trained in the wrong country, wins a major Group 1.
People are merely looking for excuses to explain their casual disregard for Danedream's chances in their prognostications before the race.
If one of the favourites had won, they'd be hailing it as a great champion, one of the best we've seen.
You could argue that SYT might have scraped second with a better draw and ride, but apart from that, Danedream won a truly run race, against genuine top class opposition, on a fair surface, in record time, in brilliant fashion, just like an outstanding Group 1 horse should.
It's not as if there was a muddling pace, or the course was like a bog, or she was the only 3-y-o in the race, or all the other horses kept bumping into one another, or were all harbouring a virus, or were all running over the wrong trip, or she was the only one with the right dosage/nicking/horoscope.