He doesn't (can't) know what he needs to win and he knows only what the ground is like as far as the clerk of the course tells him (until he gets there).
That's a load of rubbish. Weld knows exactly what to bring to Melbourne to win. Oxx knows what to bring to Ascot to win. And Colm knows what to bring to Cheltenham to win. That's why he's only run (as far as I remember) Cheeky Lady (3rd), Clew Bay Cove (5th), Zaarito (3rd), Brave Inca (1st), Big Zeb (1st) and then the black sheep Raise The Beat. He doesn't bring handicappers unless he feels they can go very close.
As for the ground. I walked the track on the Monday evening for four years in a row and, give or take, it was good to soft each time. Sometimes closer to good, sometimes closer to soft. But you know exactly what the ground is going to be on day one, give or take.
I am obviously being flippant regarding the hour comment. France is little further than England. If he isn't open minded enough to research the ground and likely opposition (like you say he does for Cheltenham) then that says more about him than I can.
If you aren't open minded enough to tell me how the logistics work, then you shouldn't pass comment on others. It's one thing going from the Curragh to Longchamp for group races but you don't even see the Irish flat trainers bringing a boatload over when they are travelling anyway.
I don't know why you feel the need to have a go at Elliott. I am sure you could make good points about why he is a schmuck but I'm not hearing any!
I keep my schmuck remarks to when you talk about the Queen Mother :lol:
As I said before, I don't know Elliott at all and he could be the nicest fella in the world, but he is a product of his marketing machine and while undoubtedly a good trainer and one who may be in the top five or the top three in the future, he has not achieved anything close to Murphy, Harrington et al.
Last edited: