Steve, we went through all this last year. You stick-up a list of RPRs and debate from a position where these numbers are essentially infallible. I have to say I find your adherence to RPRs as basically gospel very peculiar indeed.
Not Infallible, but at least a useful basis... I was asked to put them up to add some clarity to the debate. I have used RPRs, ORs, Timeform (those I have available) and Portway Press ratings which attempt to harmonise others on the same universal scale.
So I'm hardly using RPRs as gospel and wasn't arguing a position (other than to say Best Mate is probably better than DO was telling us he was... i.e. "ordinary"... and it is the Timeform rating rather than the RPR that speaks most strongly for that anyway).
Alternative opinions are very welcome, but opinions are not gospel either. This hopefully establishes a fair basis for debate.
Last edited: