Would you not be better basing it on the level of performance they can achieve in the race, rather than on any pre-conceived notions you have about physique?
If you genuinely think that KS's form in the last Gold Cup cannot compete with Denman's from the year before, then fine - you are entitled to your view.
If you think Denman is capable of a much better rating than KS achieved in March, that is also fine.
But whatever your opinion, it would be better it was based on proven ability, rather than some of the nebulous concepts put up so far.
You need a smaller shovel.
