and 1.5 sec slower race than the opening handicap
I thought there was an interesting comment made by Simon Holt afterwards in this regard;
"was that a good pace? well that's one for the speed boys to get their calculators out for and do their stuff".
And this from a man who must have watched tens of thousands of races. Where as the human eye can detect extremes it frequently struggles to regularly and accurately differentiate otherwise as the naked eye has limitations. Now it could be that Holt is one of the more humble of commentators and doesn't feel it necessary to offer a definitive opinion on every aspect of racing at every opportunity etc but it reminded me of some research a few years ago when jockeys were asked to ride horses at certain speeds. Half way through the experiment they downed tools and stopped co-operating as they felt they were falling into a trap that could undermine their professional credibility. The first sets of findings were indicating that they weren't very good at it!!! They seemed to be taking their queue from the signals the horse was sending out and weren't able to ride at a pre-determind speed, as many were coming back in to tell the researchers what speed they reckoned they were riding at, only to be some what put out when they were informed what speed they actually were riding at.
I freely admit that outside of extremes fast and slow I'm not much good at this. Why would i be? I've not be brought up with horses, not worked with them, nor ridden one, so forming a meaningful visual opinion is a weakness of mine. However, I don't compound this weakness by conning myself into thinking I possess an observational skill that I don't. It always amazes me though how many people with no real greater experience than I are so quick and self-assured to denounce a horses appearence or comment on racing pace.
Now Simon Holt did offer an opinion of sorts based on the proximity of the back marker, but seemed to be conceeding that's all he was basing the opinion on, and would prefer to trust what the stopwatch and calculator will later tell him. So fair play to Holt.
This reason for mentioning this is purely in the context of the Pouliches incidentally and the differing excuses for the defeat of Fantasia's defeat which seem to revolve around differing opinions as to how the race was run.
I'm sure we'll be back on the Oaks with the next post