P2P Expert Declan Phelan points out some interesting facts regarding Djakadam:
I will keep to my convictions and repeat that horses who have failed in previous Gold Cups deserve to be opposed. Cue Card is the most decorated runner in the line-up. In serious contention when falling in this race last year, he has been a little in and out this winter, excellent wins at Ascot and Haydock mixed with below par efforts at Wetherby and Kempton. Father time may be beginning to tell against this veteran. Every second pundit I meet seems to have a love affair with Djakadam for this race: I am dead against him. His proponents reference that he has placed second in the last two runnings of this race and that he has had his season tailored to line up fresh this time and he has enjoyed an ideal preparation as they describe it. Sounds great but let me help you deal in facts. During the career of Djakadam, he has won only once at a trip of three miles or more, that was when he won the 2015 Thyestes Chase, when competing off a rating of 145 (as a comparative Champagne West won the 2017 version off 154) …that was a handicap chase….to date, he has never won any graded chase over 3 miles plus….and he is now in his fourth year as a chaser. Returning to 2016, the narrative now is that he was not 100% in last year’s Gold Cup because he had not fully recovered from a cut suffered in a fall at this track in January….Yet this week last year Willie Mullins opted to run him in the Gold Cup in preference to Vautour because the story was he was working superior to Vautour at home….of course Vautour cruised to a Ryanair win last March, and Djakadam ended up a fortunate second in the Gold Cup (would have been third if Cue Card had stood up)….my conviction all along was that Vautour had sheer class and Djakadam does not, and they played the cards wrong in 2016, trying to win both races….spinning the story that Djakadam was out working Vautour prior to the 2016 Festival then, and now making excuses about him not having a clean preparation simply don’t tally…..what we have with Djakadam is the perfect “excuses horse”….the truth with most excuses nags is that they simply are a tad shy of the class desired to get the job done. Finally, in my case to the jury to convict Djakadam, I offer the clear evidence that he is merely a horse for the deep winter months…..his record in the last three years for races in the months of March and April….6 runs…0 wins….he is not a spring horse….I close my book of evidence there and submit that Djakadam will not be the horse to supply Willie Mullins with his first Gold Cup.