Cheltenham in general, or the new course over the old course? I'd be of the opinion that TNO is less suited to the old course. I think this will be a perfect sighter and rating of Melons ability in open company. On G/S or even soft over the new course, I rate TNO a consistent 165 horse. Should tell us a lot about Melon.
Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk
New Course is slightly less turning than the Old Course, so you may be right, DH. Fundamentally though, he jumps right, and has done for years, and it's a penalty on both courses, any way I look at it. He also has to concede four years to Melon, and I'm a lot less jazzed by the Greatwood run than some (he would have finished 5th at best if London Prize hadn't been fatally injured).
Cards on the table time.
To be fair to TNO, his handicap outings this year have been pretty good, and it's hard to knock the horse given my well-established position about wanting to see more good horses run in handicaps giving weight. My problem with TNO is that I basically think he is a fraud as a proper top-end 2-mile hurdler, and it would stick in my craw for him to win yet another decent race, for lack of any sort of serious opposition. Hopefully Melon works it right up him. I also think the trainer is an arsehole, and can't bear to listen to him eulogise once more, about a horse that is patently below G1 level, and always has been. Essentially, I should be an admirer of TNO, but I can't bring myself to do it, because NTD is full of sh*it.
PS. Aughex, don't bother your arse replying directly to this post. I know exactly where you stand on TNO, and have no intention of repeating myself, should you start trying to defend himself.
![Cool :cool: :cool:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png)