Wankerists

Grasshopper

Grasshopper

Senior Jockey
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
16,050
I have decided that I will no longer use the term "terrorist" and will instead us the more accurate term "wankerist".

They might be terrifying, but they truly, truly are wankers.
 
But categorizing these b'stards as wankerists is an insult to decent peace-loving wankers everywhere.
 
icebreaker said:
But categorizing these b'stards as wankerists is an insult to decent peace-loving wankers everywhere.
Click to expand...

I had considered this, icebreaker, but figured I was in similar territory with "cunterist", which was less likely to glide under the swear-filter radar anyway.
 
walsworth said:
That is one thing they are NOT!
Click to expand...

So did they stand one on one unarmed?

Or did they incapacitate their victim by running him over, then two of them attack him with machetes or whatever weapons?

They are cowards.

I just don't know how the police didn't kill them:(
 
Unfortunately this was always going to happen: "homegrown" insurgents of ethnic backgrounds.

You reap what you sow
 
Many on the far left will see them as brave heros Harry. You can be sure of that.

Police didn't kill them because nows the time to batter the backgrounds out of them. Some fun times ahead in a closed cell somewhere
 
Clive, you are like a broken record and talking absolute rubbish. Nobody from your mythical 'left' has done anything but treat this exactly like every other right-minded person.
 
The far left routinely cheer on Islamic attacks and are cap in hand with their jew hating, women hating (SWP/Galloway rapists) far right bigoted imans.

If they were high fiving after 9/11 they will be delighted with yesterdays attack
 
Last edited:
He didn't legitimise it. As anything.

And who are 'they'? Anyone who tries to suggest these acts are not purely random?
 
From the Guardian comments:

We need strong Muslims to come out and denounce the following Quranic verses that dictate beheading Kaffirs:
5:33-“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution (by beheading), or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;”
8:12- “I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.”
47:4- “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), strike off their heads; at length; then when you have made wide Slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives”: thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens.”

9:123: “Oh ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers and let them find harshness in you.”
2:191- “Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from wherever they drove you out.”
5: 45-- “We ordained therein for them: “Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear. Toth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal.”
2:193- “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah”
9:29- "Fight those who do not believe in God and the last day... and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute (Zizziya tax) by hand, being inferior.”
8:17-It is not ye who Slew them; it is God; when thou threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy act, but God’s…..”
When I see large numbers of Muslim politicians and scholars denounce these verses then we can start making some progress.
Until then, I despair.
Click to expand...
 
Rubbish He was linking it to the "foreign policy"

"they" are people who live in this country and hate everything it stands for and should fck off out of it

You can bet that this act was not "random" and was driven by imans and websites and to my mind, the basic idealogy of the religion of hate

It was pretty clearly planned and had the usual crap about "our lands"
 
Last edited:
from the excellent harrys Place. for those who still don't believe there's link to the far left and extremists


In contrast to the horrendous response of Asghar Bokhari – I’ve just seen Quilliam’s Usama Hasan being interviewed on BBC Breakfast. He discussed the pernicious influence of extremist speakers in mosques and campuses, and asserted that it was not enough to come out with platitudes such as ‘Islam is a religion of peace’ in response to horrific attacks – it’s also necessary to identify and criticize the ideology behind the violence. He also described how he came under fire for inviting a British Muslim serviceman to Leyton mosque (where he used to serve as Imam). Usama Hasan particularly noted that extremists were too often lent support by left wing groups. If Bokhari’s response was horrendous so, obviously, were some comments from extremists on the other side – threats to behead Muslim children for example
Click to expand...
 
Clive, you are just as much an extremist as the people you are referring to - there is no left in this case - you are picking up on isolated examples of extremists not leftists (whatever that is) - these are not representative of anything. You need to take a step back.
 
Back
Top