Wankerists

clivex said:
Rubbish He was linking it to the "foreign policy"

"they" are people who live in this country and hate everything it stands for and should fck off out of it

You can bet that this act was not "random" and was driven by imans and websites and to my mind, the basic idealogy of the religion of hate

It was pretty clearly planned and had the usual crap about "our lands"
Click to expand...

I don't see what is objectionable in what Bukhari has to say in the clip you made a link to.
 
A mainstream elected far left politican strongly supports (to this very day) and has publically promoted the iman who made this clear statement

Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the Jews people who would punish them for their corruption...The last punishment was carried out by [Adolf] Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them...Allah Willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers.
Click to expand...

And then claims hes against terrorism based on hate. What bollocks
 
Last edited:
So when it comes down to it you can't find anything objectionable in what Bukhari has to say either?
 
I have already answered that. Again, he has legitimised the attacks on political grounds,. The point is rightly made at the end of the clip by the other studio guest
 
Unless you can prove otherwise, as far as I'm concerned he does not legitimise the attacks in any way.

You need to be careful what you say here, because there are other extremists, such as those waving the flags in that clip, who will be ready to feed off claims like yours.
 
harry said:
So did they stand one on one unarmed?

Or did they incapacitate their victim by running him over, then two of them attack him with machetes or whatever weapons?

They are cowards.

I just don't know how the police didn't kill them:(
Click to expand...
Cowards use bombs and run away; think about that for a while.
 
Unless you can prove otherwise, as far as I'm concerned he does not legitimise the attacks in any way.

You need to be careful what you say here, because there are other extremists, such as those waving the flags in that clip, who will be ready to feed off claims like yours.
Click to expand...

Patronising prick

I think people can make their own minds up about much of this ""religion" with its deep intolerance, jihadist aims and authoritarian nature

its far from just the EDF who have little time for those that believe in wife beating, gay hanging, jew /Christian baiting and complete suppression for free thought and free speech

Anyone with genuine liberal views (which does not include the far left of course) could only concur

I am not going to "be careful" about what is say about what I find revolting
 
Last edited:
Wow second thread in a day where Ive had numerous reports about. As opposed to about 3 others since Christmas.

Seriously guys, stop the name calling of other members please, at a time when the forums recently got quite a few new members, and is busier than it has ever been, it doesn't exactly create a good impression.
 
clivex said:
Patronising prick

I think people can make their own minds up about much of this ""religion" with its deep intolerance, jihadist aims and authoritarian nature

its far from just the EDF who have little time for those that believe in wife beating, gay hanging, jew /Christian baiting and complete suppression for free thought and free speech

Anyone with genuine liberal views (which does not include the far left of course) could only concur

I am not going to "be careful" about what is say about what I find revolting
Click to expand...

There is nothing you can point to that is wrong with what Bukhari said yet you feel entitled to whip up hate against him.
 
Jesus Christ .. How many more times? I'm not going to explain


DVDs. Couldn't give a fck about the "sir sir see what he said?" If they can't say it here then they can stick their opinions

Odd though . Dont recall you intervening online when a couple of posters were repeatedly called a cnt on here . One was myself of course and the other a forthright poster too

So I will happily ignore your inconsistent and useless intervention
 
Last edited:
This is deadly dull

He linked the attack to British "foreign policy" repeatedly. Ok? That was giving it credibility even though he attacked the imams who stir his up

It was neither the time or the place to start pointing the finger at anyone other than the killer

The fact is that these brainwashed bigots will ALWAYS find a reason for their actions
 
I heard Boris Johnson say that it was nothing to do with Islam and also nothing to do with British Government Foreign Policy. He didn't actually explain what it was about though.
 
Walsworth. We know what it's about and so does he. The background to your brave killers is out there now

I'm being horrible to you now. But the brave ones yesterday were the women who tried to help the victim
 
Last edited:
clivex said:
Jesus Christ .. How many more times? I'm not going to explain


DVDs. Couldn't give a fck about the "sir sir see what he said?" If they can't say it here then they can stick their opinions

Odd though . Dont recall you intervening online when a couple of posters were repeatedly called a cnt on here . One was myself of course and the other a forthright poster too

So I will happily ignore your inconsistent and useless intervention
Click to expand...

I suppose you think I read every single post on here then?
I don't seem to have seen the pm you sent, or failing that the email, or failing that the report you or anyone else made. If of course you didn't do any of them, how the hell do you expect me to have seen it?

So before you start having a go at me for not saying anything, have a go at anyone who did actually read them, and didn't bother clicking a button.

Ignore me if you like, but I have asked you to stop the petty name calling, I've banned others for it who haven't been around as much so I hardly ignore it when I'm aware of it
 
He linked the attack to British "foreign policy" repeatedly. Ok? That was giving it credibility even though he attacked the imams who stir his up
Click to expand...

How on earth can you say that gives the attack credibility? Or legitimacy, which was the word you used earlier?

It seems to me you're reading something into his words that you want to be there but isn't.

As for the link to British foreign policy, what is he supposed to say? How likely would it be to see such an outrage committed by a Dane, for example, or a Canadian?
 
It was committed by a British Nigerian.

And how is that's spokesman so fcking sure that this wouldn't not have happened without "British foreign" policy? What does he know about the murderer and motivations that gives him the right to be so certain about that?

Jihad and aq peach attacks REGARDLESS of government action. Mere existence is enough

He has now been proven to be linked to organisations that promote jihad but either way how again can anyone be so arrogant as to make such a call? And I suppose w enow have to adapt our "foreign policy" to please hatchet wielding religious bigots
 
Last edited:
The only conclusion I can draw from watching the media recently, and even the debates on here, is that we aren't living in a sane age. There is always some perverted agenda behind what most people say, and its an age of guerrilla politics as opposed to politics that can be in any way productive.

Lets go back to politics of substance and ideology, and forgot all this manipulative make-beleive bollox. I'm sure Tony Blair will be wheeled out on Sky News soon to tell us that yesterdays atrocity was the reason why he went to war in Iraq.

It is a very, very sad state of affairs.

Roll on the Irish 2000 guineas.
 
Last edited:
we don't have to change it to suit Clive..but we will get this sort of thing happening

Making war against countries does have that effect in that you can get the same thing happening back at you

There is no simple answer to any of this i'm sure..but i would wager the many Germans that didn't agree with Hitler waging a war on Europe were not too happy when they themselves got killed and all their cities flattened to the ground due to actions they personally did not create.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top