I would agree with that to an extent (in that I agree that the race won't be run at a flying gallop).Originally posted by Venusian@May 2 2008, 05:47 PM
I have a feeling that the race will not be run at that fast a pace.
This may play into the hands of Raven's Pass, who, although not certain to get a mile, seemed to stick on well enough in the Craven and will be well suited by the drying ground.
New Approach should be staying on well at the death, and Stimulation looks the best of the unexposed types and could run into a place.
Mark of Esteem came stands side in his win. Beat a Tompkins horse i can`t remember the name of.Originally posted by Euronymous+May 2 2008, 08:38 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Euronymous @ May 2 2008, 08:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Warbler@May 2 2008, 09:19 PM
I don't remember Mark of Esteems win, in fact I can barely remember what happened last week yet alone 1996, but a look at the race comments for a field of 13 sugests they split into a stands group and a centre group, with the centre providing the 1-2-3. In fields of 16 or less though, low numbers seem to hold sway
George Washington 6 of 14
Haafhd 4 of 14
Island Sands 3 of 16
Entrepreneur 4 of 16
Mark of Esteem 2 of 13
Pennekamp 11 of 11
Zafonic 10 of 14
Even Top.Originally posted by Euronymous@May 2 2008, 07:38 PM
Mark of Esteem came stands side in his win. Beat a Tompkins horse i can`t remember the name of.
Originally posted by Warbler@May 2 2008, 09:07 PM
Agreed Warbler, this is what's interesting to me too.I'm not sure where the pace is going to come from among the lower numbers, and it might even be that rather than fighting for his head, New Approach might have to cut his own furrow and seek to join the higher drawn horses later?
IK has the best draw of the fancied trio, the other two being drawn at the edges.
One conundrum is what Plan is doing in the race - is he a pacemaker, and if so how effective will he be? On form figures I can't see he has any business being in the race at all, and he's not there 'for the badge' like a few of the lesser lights, so he must have an intended role, esp with such an experienced jock up.
I can't see the ground being fast enough for Raven's Pass - I think he would need top of the ground to get the trip, maybe even to be placed. I see the finishing order on Good G/S in the last two furloings as:
New Approach, Ibn Khaldun, Perfect Stride, Henrythenavigator, Raven's Pass.
If it's G/F and Good in the last two furlongs, that will help RP [into 3rd maybe?], but he's been beaten twice at Newmarket and that worries me
I'm largely influenced in that 1/2 by the opinions from the Bolger camp that NA is better even than Teofilo; and that Ibn Khaldun may not be sufficiently acclimatised due to the cold wet spring. I'm also mindful that Newmarket Rowley Mile form is important - not all horses act on the track and NA is one which has won there, unlike the other principals.
Luke: last season his trainer said Fireside would make 'a nice 7 furlong or even a 6 furlong horse'
So I can't see him winning this Guineas or even being placed
The stalls are in the centre so i`m happy with 13 of 15 for RP. He may well end up on the far side rail anyway so a low draw would have been a worry.Originally posted by Warbler@May 2 2008, 10:07 PM
As I never tire of saying, I'm not the greatets race reader, and would be curious to know where you'd want to be drawn
Originally posted by SteveM@May 3 2008, 01:07 PM
(as Shamardal was to Dubawi)
Mark of Esteem came stands side in his win. Beat a Tompkins horse i can`t remember the name of.Originally posted by Euronymous+May 2 2008, 08:38 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Euronymous @ May 2 2008, 08:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Warbler@May 2 2008, 09:19 PM
I don't remember Mark of Esteems win, in fact I can barely remember what happened last week yet alone 1996, but a look at the race comments for a field of 13 sugests they split into a stands group and a centre group, with the centre providing the 1-2-3. In fields of 16 or less though, low numbers seem to hold sway
George Washington 6 of 14
Haafhd 4 of 14
Island Sands 3 of 16
Entrepreneur 4 of 16
Mark of Esteem 2 of 13
Pennekamp 11 of 11
Zafonic 10 of 14