I'm a wee bit surprised there isn't more comment on the race since Saturday.
Was it so boring because the favourite won? Just so expected?
I've watched the race through another three times, once in slo-mo, plus I've rewound/replayed a few sections.
I still believe Noble Endeavor was a serious plot for the race but now wonder if it took to the fences or the big field. Maybe the ground wasn't soft enough for it. I noticed it lost a lot of ground very quickly from bypassing the first fence on the second circuit so the third despite not coming under any pressure and it was among the back markers by Becher's. It had seemed okay over the fences in the Becher chase but on Saturday it did lose a length or two at every other fence through being careful. I'm tempted to say the jockey didn't have the fibre to get it attacking those fences when a longer stride into them could have made ground. He seemed content to let it find its own stride but maybe those were his orders. If he comes back next year he'll carry sickness insurance but I think they'll abandon hopes for him in this race.
Also likely to abandon hope of winning this race are Step Back and Rock The Kasbah.
I wouldn't be surprised if Step Back came out and won the Whitbread again. I'd backed him at 50/1 and 60/1 for Saturday in the immediate aftermath of last year's Whitbread but I knew by the second or third fence that he wouldn't be winning. The fences seemed to exaggerate his tendency to go right. I don't recall ever seeing a horse go so badly right in all my years of watching the race.
Rock The Kasbah never got to the front and was well back early after a mistake at the first. His race was over at that point. I didn't back him because I didn't think he was feasibly handicapped but I did expect him to take them as far as two out. I imagine he'll be out at Sandown too.
I see Derek Fox has said One For Arthur had a nightmare run. I think he got a nightmare ride. It looked to me like he was giving the horse the same tactical ride as when winning but this year the ground was faster and the pace slower than in 2017. He was okay at halfway, about 15 lengths off the pace but by the fence after the Canal Turn had got over 30 lengths back. He made his move from four out and impressed with the pace that took him into fifth place at two out, just as he had done when winning, but he then hit his wall. Maybe he was just short of peak fitness following his disappointing campaign.
Almost invariably, the race is won by whichever of the best handicapped horses copes on the day and avoids bad luck. I don't believe it is a lottery and haven't for years but you do need to avoid bad luck.
Having backed Crisp like a good thing in 1973, there was no way I wasn't going to back Red Rum in 1974. Back then there were no 'official' ratings, just the weights set by the handicapper and I wasn't doing my own ratings seriously at that stage, certainly not over jumps. The chances are I'd have let a 23lbs rise in ORs put me off but even at 17 years of age I could tell Rummy had just put up a freakish performance. I backed him every year after that too.
I'm wondering, therefore, why I couldn't bring myself to back Tiger Roll the other day, despite a couple of Damascene moments along the way and despite having piled into Auxerre for the Lincoln at the same price. The first was when I checked the result of the Boyne Hurdle and saw, on the face of it, that he had posted seemingly a career high [over hurdles] by some way but then took the view that sometimes these small-field Irish race fall apart and, after all, old Bless The Wings was within 30 lengths of him and the time was very slow. The second was on Thursday evening following the discussion on here with wilsonl and I went back through the form. I could then see the argument but chose to let my belief that he was entitled to win the cross country race at the festival as he did prevail; that it didn't represent the improvement that the handicapper had said. I'd thought the same about the Gold Cup form, since I'd gone low with that race, and couldn't see Anibale Fly doing better than a minor placing so reckoned that's maybe where Tiger Roll would be but the latter has extended his superiority despite being worse off. That would confirm his considerable improvement from last year after all.
I'd also take issue with the TV commentator who repeated referred to bad mistakes by Tiger Roll. He nodded a little at two or three fences but apart from that jumped with his usual economy. Rathvinden made at least three notable mistakes on the last lap and who knows what her mistake at the last took out of Magic Of Light. I also wonder if Rathvinden ran a little with the choke out so i'd be keen to hear if Ruby has said anything to that effect or if any other observers are of the same opinion.
Anyway, I woke up this morning prepared to come on here and stand up for being wrong about Tiger Roll so let's get the slagging over with...