Thought it was only at Chantilly for this year? Anyway, going for the weekend so someone post up the winner will you please. Lets face it, need a couple of winners now after Brexit
Looking at which age group performs the best in the Arc would get most people..saying..ooh the wfa favours 3yo..they have an advantage...do they? Do older horses underperform?..easy enough to answer given a bit of analysis
It depends how you measure the performance..some will say..no 5yo has won since the early 80's..and to be fair just judged on winners that might be fair comment. I prefer to look at how every horse in the race each year has performed versus the chance it had and how many opponents it beat based on that price. This method is by far the best way i've seen to assess stats of any race.
Since 2004 we have a total of 196 horses ..lots of data there...that have run in the Arc..we know where they finished and we know how many of the oppo they should have beaten in each race because the market is..on average.. the best predictor we know of. Analysing each individual performance will show any bias towards an age group.
Using this method an IV of 1.00 is the benchmark figure for no bias....so any category having a less figure than that has performed worse than it should have..above that means ..better than it should..and so is at an advantage
3yo: 0.9900000(88 runners)
4yo: 1.0700000(61 runners)
5yo: 0.8100000(32 runners)
6yo+:0.9900000(15 runners)
from those figures its easy to see that 4yo's beat more opponents than they should do and it is in fact that age group who do best in the Arc..when compared to their actual chance of winning.
That doesn't mean they should win more..because winning first relies on being at a price where you can run above your odds and actually win. A 4yo might be 10/1..but will run probably like a 7/1 shot..beat more than it should ...but still lose.
what the figures show is that like this year where a 5yo is fav..Postponed.. he will need to run a few lbs better than the market suggests to win...not impossible obviously..but as has been seen over a number of years..in this age group you would need an exceptional 5yo to beat that under performance the 0.81 suggests its got make up...is Posponed exceptional?
32... 5yo horses have on average underperfomed to quite a degree to get that figure...even the 6yo's have run to expectations.
running to expectation is hidden data ... most people will look at wins and places..or say how unfair the wfa is etc..when in fact 3yo have no advantage whatsoever..if they did...they would all be beating the number of opponents benchmark and would be in the 1.30 to 1.50 range....whereas in reality 3yo's beat what the market suggests they should..no matter where they finish in this race.
I think Postponed is poor value..and must be taken on really
Looking at which age group performs the best in the Arc would get most people..saying..ooh the wfa favours 3yo..they have an advantage...do they? Do older horses underperform?..easy enough to answer given a bit of analysis
It depends how you measure the performance..some will say..no 5yo has won since the early 80's..and to be fair just judged on winners that might be fair comment. I prefer to look at how every horse in the race each year has performed versus the chance it had and how many opponents it beat based on that price. This method is by far the best way i've seen to assess stats of any race.
Since 2004 we have a total of 196 horses ..lots of data there...that have run in the Arc..we know where they finished and we know how many of the oppo they should have beaten in each race because the market is..on average.. the best predictor we know of. Analysing each individual performance will show any bias towards an age group.
Using this method an IV of 1.00 is the benchmark figure for no bias....so any category having a less figure than that has performed worse than it should have..above that means ..better than it should..and so is at an advantage
3yo: 0.9900000(88 runners)
4yo: 1.0700000(61 runners)
5yo: 0.8100000(32 runners)
6yo+:0.9900000(15 runners)
from those figures its easy to see that 4yo's beat more opponents than they should do and it is in fact that age group who do best in the Arc..when compared to their actual chance of winning.
That doesn't mean they should win more..because winning first relies on being at a price where you can run above your odds and actually win. A 4yo might be 10/1..but will run probably like a 7/1 shot..beat more than it should ...but still lose.
what the figures show is that like this year where a 5yo is fav..Postponed.. he will need to run a few lbs better than the market suggests to win...not impossible obviously..but as has been seen over a number of years..in this age group you would need an exceptional 5yo to beat that under performance the 0.81 suggests its got make up...is Posponed exceptional?
32... 5yo horses have on average underperfomed to quite a degree to get that figure...even the 6yo's have run to expectations.
running to expectation is hidden data ... most people will look at wins and places..or say how unfair the wfa is etc..when in fact 3yo have no advantage whatsoever..if they did...they would all be beating the number of opponents benchmark and would be in the 1.30 to 1.50 range....whereas in reality 3yo's beat what the market suggests they should..no matter where they finish in this race.
I think Postponed is poor value..and must be taken on really
Really think Mecca's Angel is vulnerable as well as the ground promises to be pretty quick. Who knows they might even scratch her on the day. The Harris 3yo blitzed the field at the track in a record time and I expect him to do the same on Sunday. 9/1 ap will be my bet of the day.
i think meccas wins hands Down, 3 lengths, the only one faster than her since dayjur was black caviar.
Off over there today for the weekend. Can't wait to go on Sunday. Backing Left Hand e.w. after write up on Sportinglife.com
Fairly sure I am going to lash into Found tomorrow -not sure if I should go place only,each way or win and place on betfair.