Originally posted by ovverbruv@May 28 2007, 07:36 AM
I reject your premise Dom, Horseboxes do not have to be on the roads, owners of horses choose to transport them to places, they are not forced into it, the same as caravaners choose to go on holidy in a caravan. if you allow a concession for horseboxes your entire argument (silly as it is) disappears
Utter rubbish.
1) all horses from now on are to be born in, broken in, ridden in, the same yard/field they are born in; never sold to anyone unless they are within walking distance of origin? After all, if it is such a "choice" horse owners make to put their horses in a horsebox/trailer and such a choice is taken away, that is what it would mean!
2) regardless of the fact that you don't like horseracing, many millions of people do. Racing would not exist if horses were unable to be transported. So - that'll be another "choice" then?
3) a horse needs to go to the vet, it has a broken leg, for example. Another "choice" in transporting it? Oh, but of course - the owner could always take the "choice" of shooting it instead, God forbid that it should be transported anywhere.
4) Police horses. Maybe you could suggest to the Met that they shouldn't be using their horses to police large social events as that, again, constitutes a "choice" involving transporting horses.
They are just a few examples and that's all before you get to transporting horses for competition. Like it or not, aside from racing, there are many sports comprising horses, to which event they have to be transported somehow.