I prefer acid rather than milk for breakfast
talking seriously
the figures I posted are adjussted to 12-0
so the horse is 174++?
I can be 10 poubds too high
but maybe I am short
he is the one with more scope of the field, has been posting good times,
and more importantly the field is full of good horses but you dont have here an Istabraq or a Rooster Booster,
what you have is an old horse that not operates at the same level on this course as he does in Ireland and some good 160s horses.
about the OR
they are simply a joke in this level
they are always conservative with this kind of horses because if they are wrong they dont want to be stupids and is much easier to explain the horse has "improve"
when something looks so good it probably is
In a Champion Hurdle as good as this one looks (think your under-estimating the quality, suny), your horse ideally wants:
1. Proven form against Grade 1 horses.
2. Proven form at the track.
3. Proven form on the likely ground.
UDS
might get suitable ground, but he has no track form and no worthwhile measurable form in this class of race.
As for the form he
has shown, how confident can you be in a lbs-per-length assessment of his level?
He's beaten trees by miles, it's true, but he's never faced more than three runners in any of his outings, they've all been in bottomless ground, and his opponents have been utterly out-classed anyway.
And what of the yard? Neither the trainer or the jockey think he can beat Hurricane Fly, and in this case, I trust their local-knowledge more, than I would Un De Sceaux's bare form.
He could be Pegasus, but there are far too many question-marks and/or outright negatives, for 12/1 to make any appeal. I'd rather back one of the pincipals (all pretty-much guaranteed to run their race), and take my medicine if UDS does turn-out to be a wonder horse.