Ardross, I've learned elsewhere from one of our august forumites that your dear favourite, KENNEL HILL, is dead. Don't know how/why - he was PU at Chelt of course and perhaps it's something connected to him losing his action then.
Ardross, I've learned elsewhere from one of our august forumites that your dear favourite, KENNEL HILL, is dead. Don't know how/why - he was PU at Chelt of course and perhaps it's something connected to him losing his action then.
Good news is that NEVSKY BRIDGE survived her horrible semi-rotational at the last hurdle, when challenging well, at Hexham yesterday. She's fine. (The RP online stat is just 'fell heavily' which leaves everything open to interpretation.)
Nevsky Bridge took a crashing fall in the last when holding place prospects and, although she got safely to her feet, this is unlikely to have done much for her confidence. She has always needed kid-glove treatment.
Your post made it sound as if I should know better - no, I don't subscribe because I can't afford it. No, I don't take the paper for the same reason. Good on you for having the money to take out the sub, but you could've just added your comment without sounding so sarcastic. 'The RP analysis states' - yes, the RP analysis did state. It stated it ONLINE, as I said. You could've added 'via subscriber-only info' but you chose not to.
I was only using Kennel Hill as an example as he was the only horse injured on the Friday, Kri. My point is that the IRC reportage does exactly what it's meant to do - provide in running comments quickly and efficiently for the purpose of form analysis. It is ABSOLUTELY NOT their role to make comments about the wellbeing of the runners and riders for a wider audience. That responsibility exists without doubt, but it is someone else's job and you're barking up the wrong tree by criticising the compilers of the official form book.I'm not blaming anyone, Rory - this time! It seems that the horse was destroyed some time post-race. But as Shadow Leader and I have both agreed before, the RP online analysis is shite at reporting injuries and deaths. 'Lame' or 'fell heavily' don't often tell the story - it's about as far as they've seen, and I'm sure Shadz said that these guys aren't even compiling their reports from on-course now, due to budgetary cuts. If you have to buy a sub or the paper in order to find out if their online 'information' is correct, it's pretty poor reportage. How can you believe any of the analysis if a follow-up says something different?
He looked to be going well, too, at the time of the incident. Bonny-looking horse.
After my brief mud-wrestle with Gareth, I wonder if I dare may ask that those who subscribe to the RP would give those of us who don't the benefit of its updates on the fallers, please?