I thought that it was a great festival.
State Man was a worthy Champion Hurdler. He isn't Constitution Hill but he compares favourably with most of the other champions of the last thirty years.
Gaelic Warrior, Corbett's Cross and Ballyburn put up imense performances. Fact to File did the business without being flashy.
Who couldn't but be delighted for Rachael & Henry with both Slade Steel and Captain Guinness.
Grey Dawning, Teahupoo, Protektorat and Inothewayurthinkin all very impressive on Thursday.
Close finishes in the Plate, and the County and Pipe Hurdles.
A couple of wins for the small trainers with Jeremy Scott and Fiona Needham.
And an outstanding Gold Cup winner.
Other than the unfortunate abscence of most of Henderson's best horses, I thought that it had everything.
Here here, Eamon. I enjoyed the racing too. There was quite literally not a day or a race that I didn't enjoy (apart from El Fab's fall).
It's become a trendy thing to knock the Festival. I thought getting round the place was the most comfortable it's been in years. The price of food and drink is comparable to any other regular sporting and music event (expensive, but why would Cheltenham be cheaper), I had a table and a seat each day, and I had a seat in the grandstand on the finishing line with great views. If I wasn't fortunate to be in the position I'm in I'd have been perfectly content watching from the grandstand steps, as I did for many years.
There were also less races with less than 8 runners than we've had a for a few years, but apparently racing is less competitive? Where racing is less competitive is through Trainers and Owners. The majority of the best horses are bought and housed at Mullins and Elliott's yards. Despite that though, we still saw winners from many more yards. 4 winners for Dan Skelton, 3 for Gordon Elliott, 2 for Henry De Bromhead and Gavin Cromwell, and individual winners for Kim Bailey, Joseph O'Brien, Emmet Mullins, Paul Nicholls, Ben Pauling, Gavin Cromwell. And significantly, winners for Jeremy Scott and Fiona Needham, who proved that the dream is still alive for the small outfits.
Willie Mullins had his usual bonanza, but that's hardly a new thing. And also hardly surprising given year after year he is essentially getting first pick of horses from Ireland and France. Gordon Elliott is essentially buying up every P2P horse that Willie doesn't want for 300-500k. Henderson and Nicholls still have a small number of owners prepared to put their hands into deep pockets. And De Bromhead gets really good money spent primarily from Robcour. Then the rest of the training fraternity have to do as well as they can from whatever scraps those four don't buy. I'd say that both Skelton and Cromwell in particular of the rest are punching well above their weight compared to the average cost of horses bought. And for someone like Jeremy Scott to have a winner and beat the Mullins and Elliott 'good things' was just wonderful to see.
The bottom line though is that if those top horses were more evenly distributed, then we would have more horses from different yards worth their place in the Graded races. As it is Mullins, Elliott, De Bromhead, and even Henderson are able to put genuine graded novices into the handicaps to dominate those too. Any perceived lack of competitiveness or numbers is largely due to that. Why should owners just send there horses for a day out. I wouldn't. And therein lies the problem. The trouble is people want to fix the problem by changing the wrong things without understanding the blindingly obvious think that is causing the problem in the first place. Scrapping races or continually changing them isn't the answer. Without solving the bigger problem we'll just end up with a series of shoot outs between Mullins and Elliott horses anyway.
People also point at Cheltenham suggesting they're fleecing people. It's not true. Some things are very expensive such as hospitality and dining. But no more so than anywhere else. Anyone been on a hospitality package to Twickenham or Wembley? Or to any other main arena. Anyone been to a Festival or a Concert? By comparison Cheltenham is at the lower end of the scale. The racecourse still needs future investment though. There are parts of the course that are now beginning to look particularly tired. Specifically in the facilities in the main Grandstand. Some of them are now very 70's and 80's and need significant investment. That's not going to come from dropping ticket prices, and selling drinks at working mens club prices. Upgraded facilities comes at a cost, and enhancing the raceday experience also come at that cost.
There's a lot of blurring of lines is going on with regards how expensive it is, and they blame Cheltenham. People talk about the cost of the Festival, but the Racecourse can only be responsible for their own bit. Accomodation in around Cheltenham is supply and demand and therefore expensive. I stayed in a Premier Inn in Stratford On Avon for a few years at a regular cost for that hotel, so there are reasonable and plentiful alternatives. People don't have to eat at the course. I never do. I eat well in the morning and then eat good food at night. Drinking alcohol is a choice. There's plenty of parking away from the course if you're prepared to walk a not unreasonable distance. I do. Going to the Festival is as expensive as people want to make it. Or it can be done perfectly reasonably too. Ticket prices vary from 50 something to low 100's, which by comparison to any alternative sport or music event is hardly excessive. Everything else above that cost is about choice.
Quite frankly the knocking of Cheltenham has become incredibly boring. Does everything really need such a major overhaul? I'm not convinced it does. Numbers are down because people are feeling the pinch. We're in a recession. When people don't have the money to spend they can't justify a major cost outside daily living. It's as as simple as that. But for others, rather than cut back on money spent while there, or even just reduce the number of days attended, it seems people prefer to moan and complain, and blame Cheltenham. They can't be to blame that inflation has spiralled out of control over the last couple of years, and everyone's spending power is less. All their staff are paid more accordingly. The cost of everything they buy has gone up proportionately. The cost of lighting and heating the place has gone through the roof. The list will be endless. It's just unrealistic to expect anything to cost anything like what it did just a couple of years ago.
As has been pointed out, many people watch at home, go to their local, or even hop on a plane and play golf in Spain. But the reality is there's not a whole lot Cheltenham can do about that. If someone can't afford it I fully understand them not going. If they can, then I don't. It's the finest four days racing of the year. The overall experience of the place is no worst that on par for any other major sporting event you could attend. Going to Cheltenham for a day is the equivalent of going to the Olympic 100m final, The FA Cup Final, The Champions League Final, The Rugby World Cup Final, Superbowl, The Masters, etc, etc, etc. And Cheltenham is a fraction of the cost of any of them by comparison. I've been to a few of them, and I can also categorically say that my overall experience was no better. And anyway I'd much rather watch what I did last week than any of those.