I
I'm not forgetting, it was Faugheen's novice season and what his 4th race? And I've put up a quote where Mullins is basically admitting he's been pot hunting and avoiding Grade 1's! And what has the Arctic Fire/Diakali notion got to do with it? I'm pretty sure the general consensus on here would be that Un De Sceaux is a better hurdler so by that logic UDST should have been running against the Fly and the latters AP prices are just a reflection of his age and the fact he got beat last year!
There might be some truth in Grassy's point about the ground but as he also points out the Hattons Grace or Morgiana, whichever the Fly ain't in, should have been on his radar.
I still think my assertion holds true that when Mullins has a good one he doesn't wait till their 12th start to pitch them into a grade 1.
And finally, when did Walsh say that about UDS/Vautour?
You forget, the Neptune at last years festival was Faugheens first Grade 1. Also, Hurricane Fly is a huge factor when trying to compare UDS hurdle campaign last season V Faugheen this season. Last year WPM did not even have an Arctic Fire or Diakali type in the Champion Hurdle, never mind a Faugheen. It was Hurricane Fly only! Such was the belief in the horse. This year is a very different story regarding HF at Cheltenham. His 14/1 price V his 5/1 price last season is solid proof of that. Annie Power wasn't even allowed upset the CH plans of HF, never mind UDS. Therefore, comparing Faugheen this season v UDS last season is an unfair and inaccurate comparison imo. It's also common knowledge that UDS is a bit of a character and can be temperamental etc. I am of the opinion that this is more so the reason for his previous race placement, as opposed to his ability. Bear in mind he has still won 2 x G2 and 1 x G3 over hurdles. You mention "the seeming lack of real stable confidence over the last season and a half" - I'm not sure what you mean by stable confidence? Every time he runs he is backed heavily and goes off at a stupid price and Ruby always speaks glowingly of him in his column. You also say that "he wouldn't have been running if Vautour hadn't fluffed his lines." I'm not so sure about this. As far as I have read from Ruby all year, he's been suggesting consistently that it's UDS for the Arkle and Vautour for the JLT. I appreciate it's almost impossible to second guess WPM, but that has been the indication all year imo.
I'm not forgetting, it was Faugheen's novice season and what his 4th race? And I've put up a quote where Mullins is basically admitting he's been pot hunting and avoiding Grade 1's! And what has the Arctic Fire/Diakali notion got to do with it? I'm pretty sure the general consensus on here would be that Un De Sceaux is a better hurdler so by that logic UDST should have been running against the Fly and the latters AP prices are just a reflection of his age and the fact he got beat last year!
There might be some truth in Grassy's point about the ground but as he also points out the Hattons Grace or Morgiana, whichever the Fly ain't in, should have been on his radar.
I still think my assertion holds true that when Mullins has a good one he doesn't wait till their 12th start to pitch them into a grade 1.
And finally, when did Walsh say that about UDS/Vautour?
Last edited: