Picking up on the idea of Mastercraftsman's presence and Sea The Stars not running, I've been wondering if there isn't another angle or two that's being over-looked here as well in the rush to laud the obvious two?
Alright the first part of the hypothesis involves more rain falling than has been forecast, but that goes without saying, and has to be a given for the rationale to stand any chance.
Now I don't know what Met Erieann are like, but if they're anything like our lot this side of the Irish Sea, I wouldn't take a blind bit of notice of anything they say beyond 3 hours.
The next thing would be John Oxx's mindset. He has the scores on the doors, what incentive does he have to face the Ballydoyle crowd again? He's raced against all of them now, and beaten all of them. He can pick and choose his conditions. Effectively, in this game of poker he's the chip leader.
So let's assume it does rain, and despite the desparate clerk declaring 'good' ground (as surely he will given just half a chance) John Oxx decides otherwise. The man isn't naturally given to chucking and chancing it after all. Then what?
Lets assume we have 'Soft' ground then (always an assumption and the whole thing is little more than hypothesis anyway) but what's the logical thing to do with Fame and Glory now? What's the evidence base to suggest that Fame and Glory won't be inconveniced by 'soft' either?
Well if Oxx has indicated that STS would be routed towards the Arc, is there really any reason for F&G to risk a tear up in soft conditions en-route to a tilt at Longchamp himself? Bronze Canon has proven already at Newmarket that Casual Conquest is vulnerable off a slow pace, so there's no good reason to believe that if F&G stands his ground, that Casual Conquest (possibly aided by Famous Name - though I doubt it) would seek to turn this into a stretch of stamina in testing conditions by forcing a strong pace. After all Casual Conquest has won both the Tattersalls Gold Cup and Royal Whip on heavy ground this term (-7.24 and -6.99). If the Arc is F&G's primary aim, would he not be better off simply reverting to Plan A and looking to meet STS over 12F's in Paris, and thus take in what is normally a much more gentle exercise assignment in the shape of the Niel?
Fame and Glory's own ground preference isn't that clear-cut either, although on balance you'd give him the benefit of any doubt.
Derrinstown = +2.64 (slow side of G/F)
The Derby = +2.39 (slow side of G/F)
Irish Derby = +1.00 (Good)
Ballysax = +0.25 (Good)
The variance figure for the Irish Derby is the interesting one, as +1.00 is good ground and Oxx ducked it. In addition to F&G, Golden Sword, Mourayan and Famous Name all beat standard time on the day in question, so the evidence suggests that STS could have run without any fear of it being too soft (would he have won? I don't know. F&G looked pretty impressive to me)
You have to go back to F&G's 2yo form to find evidence of ability on heavy ground.
Criterium St Cloud = -10.10?
Navan Maiden = somewhere between -8.04 & 9.88
I wouldn't be massively confident about the precise track variance figures, but I'd be happy that 'heavy' was accurate for both courses. At St Cloud he might have won what is technically a Group 1, and fair play to him, but beating Drumbeat half length wouldn't be a massive endorsement for his ability to perfrom on the surface. Drumbeat also came from second last place to second, where as F&G came from 3rd to 1st once they entered the straight. You might argue that he also beat Age of Aquarius, but I reckon this was the last race in which AoA actually over-took a horse, I'm not convinced he's necessarily blessed with a change of gear himself.
F&G's primary strength seems to be his cruising speed, but I still feel he takes a bit of time to reach it. Once he does reach it though, I believe he's top-drawer, but on too a soft a surface the time it takes him to get there has to be compromised surely?
At St Cloud F&G entered the straight in 3rd place, where as AoA did so in 5th. They finished first and fourth respectively, but with no more than 1.5L's seperating them (I'd love to know what the final 3 furlongs were run in). If you were really unkind you could put half of this 1.5L's down to the difference between Murtagh and Heffernan, and that's before you consider Drumbeat coming from second last to nearly snatch the verdict on the line. Might it be that in terms of acceelration on a soft top, F&G is little better than AoA?
The only other time he encountered heavy ground was at Navan on debut when he won a maiden from Sigarfield Sobers by 1.5L's with the benefit of a 7Ib claimer (who only seems to have a jumps licence today - the ominously named S. Hunter / 'Shunter' surely?). He beat Fergus McIver 7L's which would be worth about 4.5L's at levels in this race.
Would you be rushing out to take the heavy odds about F&G on soft ground against Casual Conquest? I don't know. You certainly couldn't say he doesn't act on the surface, but I'm not as convinced he's necessarily as effective on it as might be imagined even though he's 2 from 2 on it (a maiden and a weak 2yo Gp1).
Casual Conquest is 1, 3, 1 including an all age Gp1
even Famous Name is 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, with cut, although those wins have tended to come in Gp3's and the places in Gp1 and 2 (Prix Jockey Club, & Tatts GC being the Gp1's).
I can't help wondering if there isn't a bit of a case for venturing a second look at the unconsidered outsiders and effectively place a bet on a combination of the weather and the pyschosis of John Oxx - and with it, by natural extension, the commercial priorities of Coolmore. Might they reckon that Mastercraftsman is good enough to take in this assignment in the absence of Sea The Stars? Oxx certainly expressed his surprise that the horse had been left in. Or might Dermott Weld inherit the situation yet?
If the bet can be reduced to something in region of a weather forecast being wrong, well after this Summer, I'd normally take even money on that eventuality :lol: