This is where Rating become complete nonsense and punters are sold a complete lie to sell the sport to you.
Sea The Stars wins the 2000 Guineas and beats Rip Van Winkle 2 1/2 lengths
STS gets an OH of 121 Rip gets 115
They meet again in the Derby Sea The Stars beats him by 2 lengths
STS gets an OH of 124 Rip 119
They meet yet again in the Eclipse Sea The Stars all out wins by 1 length
And then it just gets silly for beating the same horse for the 3rd time but by a reduced margin he leaps up by 9 to 133
To keep thing even lets put Rip up as well so he goes up by 9 to 128
They justify it by bringing Conduit into it who was badly outpaced in the closing stage as you would expect because he was a St Leger winner never in a million years a 1m2f horse.
You could argue Conduit ran to his mark but that would make no allowance for him running at the wrong trip. Put that aside and you still can't justify any more than a 4 to 5 lbs rise.
Then when Conduit does get his trip he runs Sea The Stars closer which any good judge would expect him to do and the handicapper reduces STS rating back to where it should have been going into the race.
The truth is STS performance in the Arc was as good if not better than his eclipse win and the only reason Conduit got closer was the trip.
If I take his rating going into the Eclipse of 124 and add 5lbs he would have an OH of 129
Add to that 7lbs to coincide with the norm and you get a Timeform rating of around 136
That puts him up there with the likes of Shergar Allez France Generous El Gran Senor and Black Caviar.
It keeps him well away from Dancing Brave and Mill Reef.
Glad to listen to anyone who disagrees if they can say because of this this and this not just I have 142 for Sea The Stars I pulled it out my assh!le