Although the more you keep labouring the same point, doesn't increase the chances of being proven correct, as anyone who saw Fame And Glory in the second half of last season would testify.
I think Denman has better course form than Kauto and is a longer price, if I bet on the race it will be on Denman.
Well put FU, and i don't think anyone could disagree with your points.
...I could NC was very underrated horse and an excellent horse for course and distance.
He must have been below par when beaten 13L by Kauto Star in the 2007 Gold Cup.
...I could NC was very underrated horse and an excellent horse for course and distance.
Is there one other run where NC even nearly approaches the level of form shown by Kauto Star? I don't think so, showing just how much KS underperformed that day.
I can't believe the bookies think there is more chance of Kauto Star not winning that winning. He should be odds on, and I think people will be kicking themselves after the Gold Cup wondering how they could leave the best horse of the last 40 years unbacked above evens.
I can't see why people are getting so upset.
I don't think anyone is getting upset, Steve, but if your argument has an apparent gaping hole in it, we're entitled to point it out, no?
We're just trying to save you from yourself, that's all.
I respect your opinion but don't all known ratings (or am I wrong?) have Kauto Star as the better horse around Cheltenham?
Cheers anyway.
I'd be surprised if they didn't have Kauto's Gold Cup (won relatively easily) higher than Denman's Gold Cup (horse finished legless), thereby dispelling the myth of who is the better animal around Cheltenham!
Can you be sure that that "gaping hole" you speak of is not a blind spot in your own field of vision?
When it comes to viewing Gold Cup performances against Neptune Collonges, I reckon the 13L and 27L beatings
NC isn't the issue. It was Denman who jumped Kauto bandy and demoralised Kauto probably allowing NC to get a bit closer than he should. Don't forget that NC was fancied to be in the form of his life in March.
Kauto jumped himself bandy about a mile before Denman took it up. Far from being demoralised, he ran a terrific race to be beaten only 7L, considering how poorly he jumped and travelled.
Anyway, Neptune is the issue for Denman supporters because his proximity holds down the form of the 2008 Gold Cup - something that appears to be conveniently forgotten, in favour of promoting gingerbread-house theories about Kauto being "jumped bandy" and "demoralised".
It is only about these two. Not a horse that will not be part of the equation this time. Denman just didn't allow Kauto to run his race in 2008. The fact that Kauto also made mistakes on top of that is because he is not as natural at Cheltenham as Denman. Calling this a "ginger bread theory" is seeing only what you want to imo.