Desert Orchid
Senior Jockey
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Messages
- 25,024
Both horses are 7 years old and still novices , RP has more experience but if I had to choose who would be most likely to win this years Gold Cup its a no brainer -The Monk
I would definitely take the opposite view.
Monkfish is a high class novice, there's no denying it. But it's quite a leap from novice to open championship standard.
On my figures, which vary in scale a few pounds from ORs, RPRs and Timeform ratings - the last-named strike me as unusually conservative with novices - Monkfish has made the expected 10lbs improvement from hurdler to novice chaser. I had him on 152+p for winning the Albert Bartlett and would have him [provisionally] on the 162+p mark for yesterday. Willie Mullins was quick yesterday to suggest he didn't think Latest Exhibition quite ran his race. He's usually quite forthcoming in these post-race interviews and his insight into how a race has unfolded is, for me at any rate, an invaluable perspective.
I would see Monkfish going on to post a mark in the mid-high 160s at Cheltenham, maybe even hitting 170, which would be among the best RSA winners, so I do rate him.
But for me, what Royale Pagaille has done in his last two races is already at least around the 170 mark, backed up by ridiculously high time ratings, with the prospect of more to come. He could be a 175 this season, which is huge for a novice. I have concerns about his stamina, though. The Haydock race was a good half-furlong shorter than advertised but it did look like the further he went the better he travelled.
I would also reckon if Ricci and Mullins thought had the winning of the Gold Cup they'd be sending Monkfish for it and leaving Royale Pagaille to hoover up whichever of the novice chases they wish.
That might still happen, I suppose.