I believe that if two top-class fit horses race only twice, both over two miles with fences at two different courses three months apart and that both are ridden out and at the end of it the result is the same to within half a length, and general opinion is that both races represented the upper limit of their entire career performances, then the strong likelihood is that the difference between them is a fair reflection of their comparitive merits. Clear enough?
...the ratings...that most think are God...say that MM would be beating WC 4 or 5 lengths
I have no idea where your first point there is coming from, EC. Why should I think that Well Chief ever looked like beating Moscow? I have him as a solidly 2 length inferior animal.
Master Minded is a worthy heir to Moscow Flyer's crown, but any evidence suggesting he could beat mrs Harrington's horse over 2m - let alone give him weight in doing so - is extremely fragile.
He really is just like Kauto isn't he? Capable of great jumps before ploughing through the next one, travels beautifully, cruises around...
He jumped beautifully the whole way round today; in fact, with the exception of unseating Sam Thomas at Exeter on his first start in the UK and his mistake two out at Aintree, his jumping has been exceptional.
He jumped beautifully the whole way round today; in fact, with the exception of unseating Sam Thomas at Exeter on his first start in the UK and his mistake two out at Aintree, his jumping has been exceptional.
is Master Minded suffering the Hawk Wing syndrome with that CC win I wonder?
sorry for bringing in a flat horse Grass
is Master Minded suffering the Hawk Wing syndrome with that CC win I wonder?
I thought he hit whichever one it was that Twist Magic fell at?
Flat horses are more "Steven HawkWing syndrome" as far as I'm concerned, EC1.
I would Betsmate - we're in danger of putting Moscow into some kind of "untouchables" category that Arkle is in. Did Moscow ever beat a reigning Champion Chaser by 19 lengths .