2 questions about Scotland:
- is a unilateral second independence referendum binding on the UK government?
- I believe that Brexit terms have to be endorsed by the Scottish parliament. Can this be withheld completely or would it just be a delaying tactic?
Let me try and answer that, Arch.
1. The Westminister Government (in practical terms) only holds precedence over the Edinburgh Parliament, by mutual consent. There is precisely nothing - nothing - the UK Government can do, to prevent separation, if that's what Scotland wants. Unless, of course, it chooses to deploy UK troops against its rebellious Northern outpost....which would rather defeat the purpose.
2. This point is rendered invalid, by the above. The Scottish Parliament will (and are) actively promoting dialogue with EU institutions, to define Scottish EU membership status as a seperate entity, regardless of what Westminister wants.
I was a staunch supporter of a No vote during the Scottish IndyRef - a decision I am happy to stand behind. However, this was - in part - due to concerns about Scotland's questionable status as an EU member, in the event of independence. I never, at any point, figured that this would be in jeopardy, during this particular referendum - yet here we are.
I find it a crying-shame that, on the back of this vote, I'm essentially forced to change allegiance - from my natural inclination as a believer in the UK. The UK that I believed in - the clued-up, savvy, inclusive, progressive and confident-enough-to-lead coountry, is apparently no more. It transpires that it's a cowardly, insular and hubristic sham.
When I start supporting an independent Scotland, you can rest-assured that things are basically broken beyond repair. Without being too melodramatic, the United Kingdom feels like paradise lost tonight, and far too many of our citzens have taken what we are
really respected for, for granted.
What could have been.