Hamm, this your problem.
You think the Cheltenham form is indisputably superior, hence you view the Punchestown form as inherently inferior, and therefore think people talking it up are guilty of hyperbole.
It's worth remembering that the Cheltenham form is not necessarily indisputably better. All form assessment a matter of interpretation and opinion i.e. different shades of grey as opposed to black and white. Frankly, it would be fairly straightforward to produce a 'race analysis' which suggested both Karabak and AGD are flattered by their current official marks, and that would drag down OW's performance by default. If I say this is indisputably the case, does that mean it is so?
If you think OW's performance had more substance than HF's, then fine. But please don't try to pitch this view as if it is sacrosanct. It isn't.
GH,
First of all, apologies if my view comes across as sacrosanct, that is not what I was aiming for. What I was aiming for was to have a logical comparison of their 2 respective performances, especially in the context of the reactions on here.
What I believe, is that if one would take the time to analyse both races objectively, then only 1 horse could have shown form worth getting excited about for the Champion Hurdle.
Hurricane Fly beat an exposed 149 rated horse 2 and 1/2 lengths, albeit in some style. Lets say he gets circa 153+ for that.
Oscar Whiskey beat:
a 159 rated horse 7 lengths receiving 4 pounds
a 160 rated horse 13 lengths receiving 4 pounds
a 161 rated horse 16 lengths receiving 8 pounds.
a 149 rated horse 19 lengths off level weights
Now, that looks to me like his 4 beaten rivals all look to have finished close to their official marks bearing in mind their respective weights carried, with Any Given Day improving ever so slightly, which can be explained with him looking to be on a upward curve this season.
An assessment on the low side, through Any Given Day, would have OW on 162/163+. However, if we take the view he improved, and it looked to my eyes that the others ran their race (Celestial Halo, for example travelled as well as I have seen him in a long time), then Oscar Whiskey must have ran to 168/169+, as his manner of victory certainly deserves a +, or even a P, as it was just as stylish as Hurricane Fly's run.
My whole argument is not who the better horse is, but on their 2 respective Xmas performances. Does the above make more sense in explaining where I am coming from?