Road To The Champion Hurdle

Here are Townend's rides (I have to credit this information to the Adrian Massey site) :


10 Mar 2009 2:05 Cheltenham GOLDEN SILVER 14-1 14/17
10 Mar 2009 3:20 Cheltenham EBAZIYAN 50-1 20/23 -200
11 Mar 2009 3:20 Cheltenham SCOTSIRISH 40-1 5/12
11 Mar 2009 4:00 Cheltenham AMBOBO 12-1 20/27
11 Mar 2009 5:15 Cheltenham MEATH ALL STAR 12-1 11/24
12 Mar 2009 2:05 Cheltenham INDIAN PIPE DREAM 66-1 15/22
12 Mar 2009 3:20 Cheltenham SHAKERVILZ 50-1 13/14
12 Mar 2009 4:00 Cheltenham CLARIFIED 17-2 P/23
13 Mar 2009 1:30 Cheltenham ART SLEUTH 66-1 17/18
13 Mar 2009 2:05 Cheltenham SESENTA 20-1 8/27
13 Mar 2009 4:40 Cheltenham HANGOVER 17-2 15/23
12 Dec 2009 2:25 Cheltenham JAYO 20-1 5/17
16 Mar 2010 1:30 Cheltenham FLAT OUT 20-1 5/18
16 Mar 2010 2:05 Cheltenham QUISCOVER FONTAINE 22-1 6/12
17 Mar 2010 3:20 Cheltenham GOLDEN SILVER 33-1 6/9
17 Mar 2010 4:00 Cheltenham HAMPSHIRE EXPRESS 16-1 F/28
17 Mar 2010 4:40 Cheltenham DOCTOR DEEJAY 25-1 10/24
17 Mar 2010 5:15 Cheltenham BISHOPSFURZE 20-1 7/24
18 Mar 2010 1:30 Cheltenham THE MIDNIGHT CLUB 16-1 3/20
18 Mar 2010 2:40 Cheltenham SCOTSIRISH 20-1 6/13
18 Mar 2010 3:20 Cheltenham COUSIN VINNY 25-1 8/14
18 Mar 2010 4:00 Cheltenham JAYO 16-1 11/24
19 Mar 2010 2:05 Cheltenham TAWAAGG 12-1 24/28
19 Mar 2010 2:40 Cheltenham ENTERPRISE PARK 11-1 P/19
19 Mar 2010 3:20 Cheltenham COOLDINE 10-1 5/11
12 Nov 2010 1:50 Cheltenham BALLYADAM BROOK 11-1 3/7

Does anyone believe Ruby would have won with any those horses?
 
lets try and override Hamm's argument a bit..by using more runners in the fields

the median price for his runners = 16/1

in fields of 11+ runners 16/1 shots finish in the first 7 at a rate of 46%

he's managed that 10 times

so his % is 38%

i think thats a better representation of the stats..basically he underperforms a bit ..not bad..but I wouldn't say he's better than the average jock..slightly below average at the course i would say
 
Last edited:
lets try and override Hamm's argument a bit..by using more runners in the fields

the median price for his runners = 16/1

in fields of 11+ runners 16/1 shots finish in the first 7 at a rate of 46%

he's managed that 10 times

so his % is 38%

i think thats a better representation of the stats..basically he underperforms a bit ..not bad..but I wouldn't say he's better than the average jock..slightly below average at the course i would say


I like some of your statistics but on this case, I dont see the angle

most of the horses are non hopers and the position a horse is finishing in a 25 field for doesnt matter to finish 18th or 23th, once you are not involved with the chance to be at least placed, many drop their hands and are not trying hard.

the way to rate this jockey would be with statistics like that is to do it at Leopardstown when he is riding more races, at top level , with a good chance and riding against top horse and top jockeys,


I have been following for the last 3 years and he is a superb jockey.
 
But the Cheltenham Champion Hurdle isn't run at Leopardstown?!

I thought the discussion started with the question "would Townend be jocked off the horse for the Champion Hurdle?"
 
Agree Colin but stats gleamed from riding 12/1+ shots at the Festival and comparing them with Ruby Walsh who'll be on 3 or 4 sub 7/1 chances every day isn't the way to judge their respective merits either.

Personally I'd prefer to have PT on board - he knows the horse well, he's the horses regular rider and the last time Ruby rode him he nearly made a complete balls up of it.
 
Fair enough but he's got 13 or 14 years on Townend - PT has enough experience of the course to know what to expect of the track and the Festival in general.
 
I like some of your statistics but on this case, I dont see the angle

most of the horses are non hopers and the position a horse is finishing in a 25 field for doesnt matter to finish 18th or 23th, once you are not involved with the chance to be at least placed, many drop their hands and are not trying hard.

the way to rate this jockey would be with statistics like that is to do it at Leopardstown when he is riding more races, at top level , with a good chance and riding against top horse and top jockeys,


I have been following for the last 3 years and he is a superb jockey.

16/1 shots at Cheltenham aren't no hopers though Suny..not when some of those races have 7/1 favourites

i'm not saying its ideal to compare..I was just saying that even with those 20 odd races..you can form some sort of picture to analyse them

i would like to do the same approach with Ruby Walsh's rides from the last 2 years at Cheltenham..if someone could post the same data.

Don't forget that even if Ruby is riding shorter odds horses he will then be expected to have a very high % in the top 7..so it is a fairish way of comparing how well they ride the course
 
16/1 shots at Cheltenham aren't no hopers though Suny..not when some of those races have 7/1 favourites

i'm not saying its ideal to compare..I was just saying that even with those 20 odd races..you can form some sort of picture to analyse them

i would like to do the same approach with Ruby Walsh's rides from the last 2 years at Cheltenham..if someone could post the same data.

Don't forget that even if Ruby is riding shorter odds horses he will then be expected to have a very high % in the top 7..so it is a fairish way of comparing how well they ride the course

http://www.narrowing-the-field.com/2011/01/paul-townend-new-ruby-walsh.html
 

interesting article

i would be wary of some of the figures though..the 3/1 or less is biased against McCoy and Walsh..some of their rides at that price..would probably actually have a 4/1 chance of winning..not the sp of 3/1..PT's 3/1 shots are just that..hence he can get a higher strike rate in that price band

the figures for those "bad" courses would scare me a bit..he seems to have bogie courses..of wich you could say Cheltenham is one of them..at the moment
 
Last edited:
A few years ago when I had lots of years of Racing Systems Builder I thought of another way of assessing how good jockeys were

if any of you have good databases you might be able to try this..I used Postmark ratings as they could be queried in RSB

Use any rating system you have on your databse and measure a jockey on how he performs on top rated horses in non handicaps..you could include all races but non hadicaps are better i think.

this removes the market from the figures and if you have enough data it gives you a good picture of how good jocks are.
 
this removes the market from the figures and if you have enough data it gives you a good picture of how good jocks are.

John Whitley of Racing Research publishes an annual assessment of jockeys on the flat based on computer analysis of all performances, effectively measuring how horses perform for different jockeys. Does he do the same for jump jockeys? His flat assessments have always made interesting reading.
 
What he's saying is you're more likely to get a War of Attrition, a Kicking King or a Best Mate than an Istabraq or a Hardy Eustace. Even when a future Champion Hurdler runs in a Supreme he is outnumbered by future chasers. Tranquil Sea, Deep Purple, Calgary Bay and Kalahari King all ran in Captain Cee Bee's renewal.
 
lets have a look at these 3 mile chasers

2002 Like A Butterfly... won Irish CH after SN win..then lost in CH at 13/2..did make a 3 mile chaser 3 years later

2003 Back In Front .won Bula after SN win....btn 7/2 fav following years CH...did make a 3 mile chaser..3 years later

2004 Brave Inca..won races over 2m later..but beaten at 10/1 in followng years CH..didn't make the 3 mile chaser bit

2005 Arcalis...lost at 9/1 in following year CH..didn't mae a 3 mile chaser 12 years later

2006 Noland..out next season..then did win at 3 miles..3 years later

2007 Ebaziyan...lost at 33/1 in CH..didn't make a 3 mile chaser 10 years
later

2008 Captain Cee Bee ,,didn't run in CH..hasn't made a 3 mile chaser yet..maybe thats the key to him;)

2009 Go Native..beaten 11/4 fav in following years CH..due to make a 3 mile chaser in 2015


quite a few fancied CH runners there..2 fav's for a start..and i only looked at 10 years

sorry..had a bit of fun there..but i'm not seeing the 3 mile chaser bit
 
Last edited:
What he's saying is you're more likely to get a War of Attrition, a Kicking King or a Best Mate than an Istabraq or a Hardy Eustace. Even when a future Champion Hurdler runs in a Supreme he is outnumbered by future chasers. Tranquil Sea, Deep Purple, Calgary Bay and Kalahari King all ran in Captain Cee Bee's renewal.

i'm talking about the winner ..not the also rans
 
no..you both lost me here..the stat points to Menorah being unlikely to win the CH..as he would be breaking a 40 year trend

40 years..thats a lot i reckon..especially when we have had 2 beaten favs in the last 10 years


i've just noticed..it gets dark at night;)
 
Back
Top