The federalism way and more money and autonomy will not stop independentist continue asking for more, in Spain , Cataluña has much more than scotland is going to have and they keep asking for more and blaming the rest of Spain for their problems,
Local politicians will be even more corrupt and will want autonomy judges in their courts....
They will ask for schools competences to continúe adoctrinating the young people and is no stop story....
What should do people is travelling more and be less provinciants.
Cataluna's case is slightly different in so much as they're the strong region of Spain wanting to shed the rest of what they see as failed Spain. It would be akin to London and the south east wanting to have independence. Scotland isn't the strong region of the UK by a long way (despite what Alex Salmond thinks).
The reality however is that the Independence movement will see this as another nudge towards that end game and will of course try again at some point in the future. It's certainly not unheard of in the history of revolutions for it to require 3 or 4 goes before you succeed
When Alex Salmond can achieve 45% and lose, yet David Cameron has a mandate from 36% of the population to win, it's difficult to argue that 'Yes' have really been defeated. It reminds me a little bit of when Thatcher 'won' the first round of the leadership contest in 1990, and everyone realised she'd lost
I suspect a myth might envelop things that paints Gordon Brown as the only thing that stood between the union and independence. I call it a myth as I suspect 'No' would have won anyway, but will happily conceed that had Brown decided he fancied the job of becoming Scotlands first Prime Minister and aggressively called for a Yes vote we could have seen a different outcome
'Yes' undoubtedly had a lot of things ranged against them. The media, the Westminster machine, a smaller campaign budget, big business/ supermarket(s)/ finance institutions, the three main political parties, the UK cabinet secretary and rest of the civil service, and yet, and quite staggering really, it managed to get 45% of the vote
It's worth reflecting how fragile things were. It is possible that one man who was vilified by calamity Cameron etc has held it together. If it is? then this is just a transient roosting post. A bus stop on the way independence. If Scotland governs under a revised federal devo max position for 15 years without encountering any significant crises (indeed, you could argue that manufacturing, managing, and absorbing a stress crisis is to their advantage) then the nationalists will be even more emboldened. Think of it as a training and confidence building exercise progressing to full independence. If this period also coincides with the continued shift to the right which we've seen across Europe and the UK, then the conditions will be even more fertile.
With the West Lothian issue resolved in England's favour it's difficult to see how a Scottish politician can come to the fore to occupy the status and gravitas that Gordon Brown did. He himself of course will be older and less influential by then
You have a juxtaposition of things really which you'd summarise as more conservative governance south of the border coinciding with nationalised socialism north of the border. Provided this temporary federal accommodation hasn't seen Scotland meltdown, then the partings of the ways will become inevitable.
One of the more interesting things to observe over the next few years might be how decisions relating to long term infrastructure are made. HS2 is one example, but there will be others concerning transport or defence establishments
The other major player that is going to have to adjust is of course the Labour party. Contrary to what people might think, today's labour party is compratively quite young and by no means has a copyright on socialism. The SNP has always had a socialist agenda too but for such time as they shared that philosophy the SNP were seen as an imitation. Why vote for that, when you could vote for a more empowering version. The SNP remained static however. It was Labour who shifted to the right and moved through the centre ground to occupy a position closer to that of the American Democrats. This might suit their aspirations in the wider UK, but it means abandoning their traditional support base in Scotland. Naturally enough the socialist vote of Scotland witnessed this shift and accepted for so long until it became so unpaltable they could no longer support it. Instead of blindly voting for the changed party, they reassessed the field and started voting for the same philosophy represented through the SNP. It wasn't so much a case of people abandoning labour, as much as it was labour abandoning people. If the SNP can somehow dilute the nationalist element a bit, or frame it through the prism of a rejection of english neo conservatism, there's a clear populist chord they can tug at which makes the SNP (national socialists in everything but name) the natural choice of government. The Scottish labour party will now need to throw off the chains of middle class english new labour in order to be relevant, otherwise they'll simply fade away.
This creates the grounds for the SNP to win another majority at an unspecified point in the future under Nicola Stugeon (actually she said a few things last night at 05.30 in the morning that made me deeply suspicious as to whether or not she's anointed). She seemed to be staking out a position without Salmond's blessing. It was as if she was forming a breakaway and making her decisions.
Anyway, the next time they test this vote to get an affirmitive answer, 20 years or so Scotland will be independent. Wales won't however, and neither will any of the English regions