Desert Orchid
Senior Jockey
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Messages
- 25,024
At the end of the day it's all guess work. When you consider Thistlecrack only beat Silviniaco Conti 3 lengths at Kempton where the hell did his rating on 171 come from in the first place?
When Cue Card obviously ran miles below his best surely the OH should eliminate him completely and look at the next horse which was Silviniaco Conti 163 who has finished a sh hd in front of Tea for Two in a shyte time.
You know I agree with you on this one, Tanlic.
I think I understand where the OH is coming from although I disagree with it. I have that prerogative and the OH should have the prerogative to rate the form for what it is but I believe they have procedures for rating races where the collateral form amounts to little, which has probably been deemed to be the case in the King George. The procedures involve the historical ratings for previous winners of the race. It's a procedure that probably works most of the time, to be honest, but I couldn't go along with it at Kempton, just as I couldn't in that Gold Cup of Best Mate's when he only just held off that old plodding handicapper.
I went low with the King George. I went high with BDM's Haydock win. I end up winning or losing money on those judgments. That's what doing your own analysis amounts to.