I don’t do ratings myself GH, I go more by form line and visuals rather than some of the number crunchers on here who do their own ratings, I wouldn’t have the patience or time for that. Think there was a thread on this last year (form lines v ratings) where I put fwd my case for the former so honestly I wouldn’t know about how to start marking him up. How do you interpret what rating he’d have gotten if Geraghty had pushed the button. That, in my opinion, is the flaw with marking up ratings. Everyone said after Sandown last year he’d have to find 10+ pounds to win a champion. Trouble was he didn’t. He was a lot more value for his win at Sandown than the ratings allowed for. I think he’ll prove to be more for Newcastle in time too.
I am however certain, as I was last year, that this horse is a monster and there is so much more improvement again this year and his jockey & trainer alluded to that too. He will have surpassed Faugheen’s rating at the end of this year. I am also certain that Faugheen, as a 10yo, will not improve on his current mark giving that his trainer said live on ATR at the end of Fairyhouse last Sunday he was all most at 100% fitness.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fair enough, KA. Not everyone likes to hang a number on a performance, though in the absence of one, it’s hard to get into a detailed assessment of where we might differ.
Insofar as BDA’s Newcastle run is concerned, it is effectively meaningless from a ratings perspective. If forced to give one, it would be in the high-140’s for me, but with so many +’s after it, they would run off the page. My point being that the race should basically be ignored in the context of assessing BDA’s level. It proved little more than he still has a leg on each corner, and remains head-and-shoulders above the limited opposition he faced. You can’t read any more than that into the race, and trying to build a collateral-form case around Irving to demonstrate his superiority, is both pointless and unneccessary.
I’m genuinely a huge fan of BDA, and fully understand your enthusiasm for the horse. I guess I just think that Faugheen commands a little more respect than you’re perhaps affording him, and that your apparent undimmed confidence is maybe a little bit misplaced.
At his best in the 2016 ICH, Faugheen put up a better 2m hurdle performance than even my beloved Fly managed in his illustrious career......and if I’m prepared to admit as much, then I can’t understand why others would fail to acknowledge it too. By any measure, Faugheen was, and hopefully remains, a great, great hurdler - right up there knocking with the very best (including Istabraq, and the hurdling stars of the 70’s) - and he should, in my view, be afforded the recognition this deserves. A prolonged absence from the racecourse should not be allowed to diminish his achievements beforehand.
As I say, he seems to be the only serious threat to BDA at this stage........but if he does retain all his ability, I think he is a much graver threat than you are perhaps prepared to concede.
I wish you all the best with BDA, and offer a sincere apology for being an unnecessarily, narky cu*nt yesterday.