the problem is you don't agree with anything the handicapper does, so what are you trying to argue if your metric is so completely different from any known rating organziation? Also based on your 20 lengths CC win, the comparison with SS and KS its obvious you don't know how handicapping works, the difference between trips and pounds per length used in handicapping, etc. so why do you even try to use the figures from it to argue anything? I remember the Arkle debate you tried to cover this with you being around back then. Well there are many around now that don't understand the difference between horse A and B class and form and rating, its not like you've been back then the head of handicapping or Phil Bull so that your methodology that you use today can be made to spot errors from past.
Just for the hell of it here
Timeform’s pounds-per-length is approximately 25%-30% higher than the BHA. Pounds-per-length is not a method Timeform use you smart ass it is the end result from their calculations. They actually use pounds per seconds and have done since the late 90's to get to Lbs per length and they don't give out how they do it exactly to anyone.
Any fooker can understand the BHA's methods they are childsplay run by children.
I pulled the BHA up back in 2010 regarding their methods and their total disregard for the obvious and how robotic they were in their methods.
It came about when before the Dewhurst they had come to the conclusion Dream Ahead was 5lbs superior to Frankel.
After along drawn out debate on TRF I asked them how on earth could they come to the conclusion that Dream Ahead was a 128 horse?
When they answered me that was the day I realised how fucked up their system was.
Dream Ahead beat Strong Suit and Approve none of who could go a yard on the ground.
Ok it was the Middle Park but it was one bad renewal with the main danger hating the ground
Despite the fact there was no evidence to say Dream Ahead should go up any more than a couple of pounds he was put up a whopping 11lbs.
I had a right set to with the OH and asked him how could he possibly justify such nonsense and I could not believe his answer.
They based their findings on not Strong Suit but on a horse called Prolific Champion who had won a desperate group 2 in France was beaten into 6th in France by Dream Ahead.
They said that the form was solid and the rise justified in their opinion because Dream Ahead beat Prolific Champion 6 lengths further in the Dewhurst.
The thing was a monkey and was never at the races at any point..........but hey he won a Group 2 WOW!!!!!
The magic words GROUP 2 they don't discriminate to them a Group 2 is a Group 2 and to hell if it was a **** race your going up anyway
How did that all turn out for them.......
They are robots and it's got nothing to do with not understanding it's the exact opposite. They are a guide we all use from time to time but they get about 1 race in a hundred right and 1 in a million spot on.....they are not Gods