i guess it's all how you define 'best'sums up perfectly why AP's the the best we've ever seen.
not the most talented rider though of his generation though
the TF article would suggest otherwise really
at the end of the day..what are we talking re talent?..how are you going to judge someone as better than him?..what criterion would you use?
there is no other jockey ever going to achieve what he has that is for sure on the track...he also has a popularity that no other jock including Lester has got near
he doesn't ponce about like some jocks..but that doesn't make someone more talented just because they may look more stylish
The TF article is flawed, as most statistical analyses are.