B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
His Guineas win showed that he has speed, but, at the same time, probably confirmed that he wasn't a miler.
I think you can take that evidence one of two ways:
1. He showed enough speed to win the Guineas at a mile so will be exceptional when he steps up to his correct trip of 10f/12f.
2. He showed enough speed to win the Guineas at a mile so might well not stay when stepped up to what people perceive to be his correct trip.
I think he will, at the very least, get away with the trip in the Derby and I think he will probably be stay fine. You obviously can't be certain that he will until he tries.
I was under the impression (I confess without doing the research myself) that Bonfire's stamina was in question as well. I thought his dam was more of a speed influence.
However, as the old saying goes, if the horse is a definite stayer then it is probably too slow.
The thing that irks me about your post Zeneytta is the constant referring to Camelot showing speed, ok fair enough I give you that the horse has the ability to go from A-Z but I'd put that down to class rather than speed.
If we're talking about acceleration he'll fall in that bracket to but the real speed is being able to sustain your maximum level of velocity over a longer duration than the rest and the classier horses can do this for longer but what we saw in the 2000 Guineas is the horse didn't sustain this and more worryingly he didn't sustain this under a slow-medium pace.
For me he's just the class above the rest in the 2000 Guineas field which enabled him to get out of the position he was in but let me tell you this the bar will be raised on the energy he's going to have to consume through the likely hood of a strong pace come Derby Day and those questions about his speed will be put into question because when he's going to be asked to do a 2:28:00 from 2f out after his excertions throughout the race I can guarantee you there won't be much of a long lived effort despite inevitably travelling through into a promising position where he'll be an even bigger lay in running.
Put it this way, if Camelot had never run in The Racing Post Trophy then his 2000 Guineas win would have been put under immense scrutiny and I hold my word by that in saying that if anything that race has given him visually the reputation that lays before him right now and people are assuming his 2000 Guineas effort was a significant evidence of this when it clearly wasn't, it clearly to my eye wasn't.
Take away the RP Trophy and he's a no-mark like Astrology, Imperial Monarch, Memphis Tennessee who quite worryingly have probably put up better racecourse performances than Camelot but we go back to the old adage of the The RP Trophy were he "sauntered through the field on the bridle, visually a remarkable performance".
He'd be at least a 4/1 shot without that run.
Last edited: