S
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
I apologize to anyone that I've upset but I wish that this thread will remain because I do like posting my thoughts on here regardless of what criticism that comes my way.
I'm not sure what I've done to upset so many as I can't find the problem in this thread anyway - may we all try and get along together because I'm avoiding the topic to save getting into a long winded argument because this forum is not what that's about!
Now...
Looking for Kinloch Castle to come in for a big double
I'm not sure what I've done to upset so many as I can't find the problem in this thread anyway - may we all try and get along together because I'm avoiding the topic to save getting into a long winded argument because this forum is not what that's about!
Now...
Looking for Kinloch Castle to come in for a big double
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
Would be nice if Jeannie Galloway comes in!
I think she could be a 5f horse but has great times at Musselburgh...
I think she could be a 5f horse but has great times at Musselburgh...
rorydelargy
At the Start
Unfortunately, a request to have that email forwarded came to naught - thought it might be you!
M
Marble
Guest
Bruce, on a serious note you don't need to proof every bet with what you're doing on betfair. I know you feel this vindicates you but you will pile more pressure on yourself, and should settle for just posting up your selections (with points?) like most of us mugs.
M
Marble
Guest
View me as your editor Rory. I want strong opinions, based on your pinsticking talent, on the classic winners this year. Please
S
SlimChance
Guest
I heard your request. I so wanted the phrase "Factory workers" to be said on air. Enjoyed the programme though.
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
Bruce, on a serious note you don't need to proof every bet with what you're doing on betfair. I know you feel this vindicates you but you will pile more pressure on yourself, and should settle for just posting up your selections (with points?) like most of us mugs.
Hey Marble,
No more bets will be posted.
Last edited:
swedish chef
At the Start
Don't give up Bruce, I was enjoying this thread. In fact I'll join in and starting with £100 - I will try and turn it into £1,000
Yarmouth
5:55 Chankillo 5pts win 5.5
Redcar
2:35 Zefooha 5pts win 3.6
Chepstow
2:15 Princely Player 5pts win 5.17
2:50 The Chazer 5pts win 5.5
Fairyhouse
2:40 Oscars Well 5pts win 2.78
All the above have an in running lay @ 1.05 for 30pts
Remaining bank: 70pts
-------------------------------------------------------------------
4:50 Raptor 2.5pts win 65.0 with an in running lay at 3.0 for 30pts & 2.5pts place @ 10.5
Last edited:
I asked the question giving Bruce the benefit of the doubt that there may be something real behind this. As he continues to elude attempts to clarify his methodology/rationale we can but draw our own conclusions.
It's clear to me he is taking us for a bunch of idiots. This is where my "interest" begins and ends.
Last edited:
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
Bit too early to show signs of results but I'll try to show you using the opening card at The Curragh this season.
Dawn Approaches race showed that horses will be suited for a step up in trip, three horses have run over 5f again and all losing.
Redoutable's race showed that horses will be suited for a step down in trip but there has only been three horses to run from the race all stepping up in trip and losing.
Croisultan's race showed that horses will be suited for a step down in trip, there has been six runners from the race that have either run over 6f or over further all have lost.
Amira's Prince race also showed that horses will be suited for a step down in trip, there has been 4 runners since that have run over the same trip or further, the second horse Speaking of Which won.
/
Anything else I can help with?
Why on earth would I sit here and talk a load of garbish if I didn't feel it meant something credible?
Just wait until the season unfolds, I'm not quite sure where all this hostility is coming from.
Get a grip.
Last edited:
Colin Phillips
At the Start
"garbish" is an interesting word - half garbage and half rubbish one supposes.
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
You're learning
rorydelargy
At the Start
I think what we want to know is, to take the above as an example, why you believe that all 30 runners in the 3-y-o maiden at the Curragh will be worth following over 5f, and what it was that led you to such an astonishing conclusion based on information which you haven't shared.
Simon
At the Start
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,314
I know Aston's not the finest university in the world, but is that the best you can come up with?
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
Enlighten me on what I was "supposed" to come up with?
I made my intentions clear at the beginning of this thread that this would be somewhere to post some selections on the Flat Season with a goal in target.
Explain to me where I've meant to have come up with some ground breaking idea and show me where I've unearthed a new scientific method of analyzing though bred performance?
It's just a way of using terms to express the information displayed on my screen and through my formulas, if you can't accept the terminology or the way I do things then I suggest you leave the thread for your own personal health - it's quite clear some of you are getting wound up.
You sir are quite clearly mistaken in your approach and expect a full apology in good time.
Last edited:
Simon
At the Start
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,314
Well firstly the plural of formula is formulae rather than formulas, but don't let a good bit of English get in your way. After all you could wipe the floor with everyone on here. Anyway, you're not describing a formula, you're describing a method (quite different) unless you've actually come up with your own formula. I understand you don't want to divulge your 'trade secrets' on here so perhaps you'd be more at ease discussing them over a pint in the B4 bar, or are you too busy with that 8,500 word dissertation, Professor Savage?
Last edited:
B
Bruce_Savage
Guest
Congratulations you've finally broke a man down into pieces.
I just can't fight this no more, I really don't have the heart or will power to keep going on through this constant barrage of abuse.
I'm done, and yes it has actually got me quite down lately but hey ho.
Catch some of you around maybe.
I just can't fight this no more, I really don't have the heart or will power to keep going on through this constant barrage of abuse.
I'm done, and yes it has actually got me quite down lately but hey ho.
Catch some of you around maybe.
icebreaker
At the Start
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2005
- Messages
- 2,957
Well, that is a shame and a pity. (Always a pity to lose a regular and consistent poster).
I enjoyed Bruce's musings, and I do hope he reconsiders and returns.
swedish chef
At the Start
Don't give up Bruce, I was enjoying this thread. In fact I'll join in and starting with £100 - I will try and turn it into £1,000
Yarmouth
5:55 Chankillo 5pts win 5.5
Redcar
2:35 Zefooha 5pts win 3.6
Chepstow
2:15 Princely Player 5pts win 5.17
2:50 The Chazer 5pts win 5.5
Fairyhouse
2:40 Oscars Well 5pts win 2.78
All the above have an in running lay @ 1.05 for 30pts
Remaining bank: 70pts
-------------------------------------------------------------------
4:50 Raptor 2.5pts win 65.0 with an in running lay at 3.0 for 30pts & 2.5pts place @ 10.5
Well that was a cracking start with only winner having a 30% reduction minus the £1.50 for the lay at 1.05 - I had a return of 10.65pts giving me a loss on the day 0f 19.35pts and a bank of 80.65pts
dvds2000
Gone But Not Forgotten
Whats the reason you are mentioning a place in relation to this thread? If thats actually a place where Bruce does drink then personally I think you are totally out of order, assuming he hasn't already mentioned this on here himself, and it comes across as a bit confrontational.
swedish chef
At the Start
Fulham v Chelsea
HT/FT
Draw/Chelsea 3pts 6.4
Fulham / Chelsea 2pts 30.0
HT Score 0-1 3pts 4.7
Bank 72.65pts
HT/FT
Draw/Chelsea 3pts 6.4
Fulham / Chelsea 2pts 30.0
HT Score 0-1 3pts 4.7
Bank 72.65pts
Bruce, I don't pretend to always be able to follow your logic but I do find your thread fairly interesting. Please don't stop. Too many bandwagon jumpers looking to score easy points in a pathetic attempt to 'impress' their peers. Stick at it and feck the begrudgers.
Euronymous
Senior Jockey
Quote:
Positive Speed
Step up in trip, testing course OR testing Ground
Negative Speed
Step down in trip AND testing course OR testing Ground
Positive Stamina
Step down in trip, Easier course OR Faster Ground
Negative Stamina
Step up in trip AND Easier course or Faster Ground
I too have found this thread interesting, but it's the numbers attached to these criteria that I don't understand.
Positive Speed
Step up in trip, testing course OR testing Ground
Negative Speed
Step down in trip AND testing course OR testing Ground
Positive Stamina
Step down in trip, Easier course OR Faster Ground
Negative Stamina
Step up in trip AND Easier course or Faster Ground
I too have found this thread interesting, but it's the numbers attached to these criteria that I don't understand.