Canford Cliff's best run is beating Premio Loco 3.5 lengths - 'shudders'
The Jacques race
G beat Aqlaam by 6 lengths..two runs later RVW beat Aqlaam nearly 15 lengths
so which Aqlaam turned up on which day?..or is that Aqlaam at best on both runs?..or did Aqlaam run below form on both days
can't see its bombproof tbh
Aqlaam looks the complete OXO horse to me..runs well..runs below..runs well
Completely and utterly disagree with this.
On his very next run in the Morny, Aqlaam proved beyond any doubt that he is a cast iron 120 horse at the least. In the QEII he was sent off at a suicidal gallop that he was never going to be able to maintain; using the Ascot race to denigrate Aqlaam is beyond farcical in my opinion.
This is all reinforced by the fact that Virtual ran virtually to the pound with Aqlaam in the Morny.
She may not have ran to that level on any occasion last year (I am not arguing she has) but I can't for the life of me see how anyone can crab that form.
In that case, why not use Virtual (held up last in the Marois), beaten 11 lengths (rating 117) and subsequently beaten 4.5 lengths in the Morny?
Or is an 'OXO horse' as well?
then shall we go to the next horse..and the next..until it fits the rating required?
you just said that Aqlaam was rock soild..he isn't.
like i said..if folk want to think G is a mid 130's or whatever..then all power to them
We're never going to agree on this. You said the pace horses 'faded'; despite the fact that Goldikova was never more than a couple of lengths behind Aqlaam, I simply pointed out that if you rate the race through the third home (held up) you get pretty much the same figure.
I'm not asserting that Goldikova is a mid-130's mare; 132 (sunybay's figure) looks about right to me.
Video of the 2009 Marois, by the way:
http://world-horse-racing.blogspot.com/2009/08/prix-jacques-le-marois.html
he ran too fast too early in both races..so why is G's a valid 6 length thrashing and RVW's 15L not?
NO CC hasn't run a massive rating figure..but against RVW he was pace disadvantaged and still run past him comfy..not many were going to do that to RVW especially when he was on the front of a steady pace
I like Dick Turpin but also intrigued by Worthadd - can't imagine he's come from Italy just on a fishing trip. Should be a good race.
the only advantage Dick Turpin has is the fact he's had a run and proven he's trained on.
Because Zacinto also beat Aqlaam by over a dozen lengths in that QE11. And Zacinto is shite.
The WFA scale favours 3yos in that particular contest and RVW wasn't as good last year anyway.
I also don't like the vibes form the Hannon camp re today..i wouldn't touch todays race with a bargepole..I could see both his losing and a load of excuses given afterwards..i hope thats not the case..but the race isn't a betting medium to me..conflicting messgaes from the betting for a start
So ..when RVW won at York off an unfavoured pace against Twice Over..he wasn't as good?
But G wasn't on the pace exactly was she
i don't know why 125 is deemed poor for a filly tbh..it seems so important that G is a 130 horse
anyway..its one of those where we aren't going to agree..and tbh PB always marks G for me..we know he was a good marker for a long time..and G never hammered him enough to be a 130 horse..imo
NO CC hasn't run a massive rating figure..but against RVW he was pace disadvantaged and still run past him comfy..not many were going to do that to RVW especially when he was on the front of a steady pace
you can't rate it accurately..but you know its pretty good..more than a mid 120's anyway..imo
The excuses are coming in pre-race from the Canford fans!
e ran too fast too early in both races..so why is G's a valid 6 length thrashing and RVW's 15L not?